Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio

[jjc.li@utoronto.ca]

I am quite sure it's the same 3 regions. Because I just input the 3  
regions dataest. I will try to use-force-, then run it again.

Thank you.

Quoting Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>:

> --- On Tue, 17/3/09, jjc.li@utoronto.ca  wrote:
> > The previous results is from the estimation of a "7
> > regions dataset".
> >
> > Then I use almost the same command to do the estimation of
> > a "3  regions dataset". The only thing I change is that I
> > choose first 3 regions of the total 7 regions and also
> > modify the command that related to the dummy varible. This
> > time, it gives a negative value.
>
> Are you sure both models A and E refer to the same 3 regions?
>
> Did you specify the -force- option in -lrtest-?
>
> --Maarten
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
>
> http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/