Re: st: re: retruned r(198) in nlsur

[jjc.li@utoronto.ca]

Hi Kit,

Thanks! I just corrected all the left ticks. However, it returned  
r(111) this time.

r(111) consist of several kinds of error. I have no idea which one is  
in my case.

Jingjing



Quoting Kit Baum <baum@bc.edu>:

> <>
> JJC said
>
>          scalar 'al'='at'[1,1]
>          scalar 'ak'='at'[1,2]
>          scalar 'am'='at'[1,3]
>          scalar 'ae'= 1-'al'-'ak'-'am'
>
> and wonders what might be wrong. These references (and all throughout
> the program) must dereference macros with the left tick (accent grave)
> on the left, e.g.
>
>          scalar `al' = `at'[1,1]
>          scalar `ak' = `at'[1,2]
>          scalar `am' = `at'[1,3]
>          scalar `ae' = 1-`al'-`ak'-`am'
>
> Unless the left ticks have been changed to apostrophes (') by the email
> program, they are invalid syntax.
>
> Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin   |
> http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
> An Introduction to Stata Programming   |
> http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
> An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata   |
> http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/