Thanks a lot for your responses.
Yes you are right. The term X4*Y1 is also endogenous, but only because of
the Y1.
Unfortunately, I cannot include the equation (y1x4 = X1 X2 X3) as an
additional "First Stage" equation, because I do not find appropriate
instruments and the estimation would not converge.
Also, in my final model I have more than one interaction term (4 to 6,
depending on the model). So the best thing would be, if I could estimate the
endogenous variable Y1, calculate the interaction terms and include them in
the final equation.
Isn't there any way to implement that in STATA? Unfortunately my programming
skills are not sufficient enough to modify the cmp procedure or to build my
own ml model. The equations get quite complicated due to the Instrumental
Variable design.
Would be really nice if you could give any further advice.
Tanks in advance,
Marko
____________________________________________________________
Marko Bender
Doctoral Candidate / Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
KfW Endowed Chair in Entrepreneurial Finance | Prof. Dr. Dr. Ann-Kristin
Achleitner
TUM Business School | Technische Universität München (TUM)
Arcisstr. 21 | D-80333 München | Germany
Tel.: +49 (0)89 289 25189 | Fax: +49 (0)89 289 25188
[email protected] | http://www.wi.tum.de/ef
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: David Roodman ([email protected]) [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März 2009 17:05
An: Austin Nichols; [email protected]; [email protected]
Betreff: RE: st: How to calculate a new variable (interaction term) in ml
model
Yes, that is right Austin. Or the y1x4 equation can just be dropped, in
which case y1x4 is treated as exogenous. It is of course the user's
responsibility to decide whether the y1x4 equation, if any, is appropriate.
--David
-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Nichols [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: How to calculate a new variable (interaction term) in ml
model
Marko Bender <[email protected]>:
I have never used -cmp- (on SSC), but it looks to me like you have two
endogenous vars on the RHS in Eq2: Y1 and Y1*X4. You might try
g y1x4=Y1*X4
cmp (Eq3: y1x4 = X1 X2 X3) (Eq2: Y2 = Y1 X4 y1x4) (Eq1: Y1 = X1 X2 X3)
if that makes sense.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Marko Bender <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Dear stata users,
>
> I'm trying to estimate a recursive multi-equation model with cmp.
> In the first equation I would like to estimate a variable Y1 (dependent
> variable). Then I would like to include this variable as an independent
> variable in equation two. So far this is not a problem.
> The problem is that I also want to include Y1 as an interaction term with
> another variable X4. In order to do that I think I would need to generate
a
> new variable, which includes the interaction term (X4*Y1). Unfortunately
> stata does not allow for any calculations within equations.
>
> Does anybody know how to do that? Does anybody know a work-around?
>
> The model looks like this:
>
> cmp (Eq2: Y2 = Y1 X4 X4*Y1) (Eq1: Y1 = X1 X2 X3), ind($cmp_cont
$cmp_cont)
> quiet;
>
>
> The equations are defined according to the ml model eq syntax. So one
> thought of mine was to include a third equation, which generates my
> interaction term. Unfortunately I did not find a way to do that so far.
>
> I would be really greatefull for any suggestions and help!!!
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Marko
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
