The archive shows the contributions to the thread.
You can get Weibull deviates in at least three ways:
1. by using -generate- directly, through something like
gen weibull = b * (-ln(runiform()))^(1 / c)
2. by using Bobby Gutierrez's more general -gengammareg-
3. by using Joe Hilbe's -rnd-.
As I see it, 3 offers no advantage over 1 beyond the fact that you don't need to know the formula with 3. 2 has a major advantage over 1 or 3 in that it can cope with (e.g.) generating deviates conditionally on linear predictors.
As all this is evident by looking at help files, I am not sure what scope remains for a detailed discussion. If people don't understand, they should ask specific questions.
Also, be aware that -rnd- is a not an equivalent to -simulate-.
Nick
[email protected]
Muhammad Riaz
Well, I will stop adding more on this topic as it is going to be an issue now.
my aim was just to help, I don't remember who else has provided another method to generate data from weibull. It will help Nikolao if somebody could tell him how to use -rnd- instead -simulate- in his problem. Also comparison of the two methods will give better understanding of the topic if somebody else has thrown another method.
I welcome and appreciate your comments.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
