<>
Phil,
-mfx- uses the conventions of -predict- after estimation commands, so you
can obtain information about the options for -mfx- after -tobit- from
*************
help tobit postestimation
*************
Look for "Syntax for predict".
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. März 2009 11:46
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: mfx with tobit
Hello,
I am running a regression model where the observations are censored from the
left (at zero). Therefore, I use a Tobit model. Due to heteroskedasticity
present in my data, I use the intreg command to obtain robust standard
errors. However, I have two questions in this regard.
First, the coefficients obtained from Tobit estimation cannot be directly
interpreted. I found out that it is possible to use the mfx command to
obtain the marginal effects and that different options exist to compute
these effects; e.g. mfx, predict(e(0,1000)) or mfx predict(ystar(0,1000)).
However, these commands lead to quite different results and I am not able to
figure out which command is preferable in which situation?
Second, I have another dataset where the observations also pile up at zero,
however, in this dataset the dependent variable does not only take on
positive values, but sometimes also negative values. I am not sure which
estimation technique is preferable in this case?
I would appreciate any help,
best regards
Phil
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
