|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: AW: poisson distribution, transformed variables and implications for xtreg fe or re
From |
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]> |
To |
<[email protected]> |
Subject |
st: AW: poisson distribution, transformed variables and implications for xtreg fe or re |
Date |
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:51:21 +0100 |
<>
Austin Nichols had a couple of thoughts on the -poisson- thing in Chiacgo,
see page 22 of http://www.stata.com/meeting/snasug08/nichols_gmm.pdf
For the "best" transform, also see -h ladder-
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
[email protected]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. März 2009 11:43
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: poisson distribution, transformed variables and implications
for xtreg fe or re
Dear statalist,
I have a query about using the poisson distribution and transformed
variables. I have a panel data set with mortality information (DV) from 74
countries from 1980 to 2006. I have transformed the DV using a square-root
transformation. Previously I have been estimating this DV using xtreg fe, re
and xtabond2. However, someone mentioned to me that I should try and use the
poisson distribution in my estimation techniques. I have tried this using
xtgee but this will not run on some of my clusters (due to missing data?).
Also, I am not sure whether I can run a dynamic model such as xtabond2 using
the poisson distrubution.
I have noticed that other research papers have not bothered to use a poisson
distribution and merely used transformed DV scores. Is it neccessary that I
use a poisson distribution?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
Allison
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/