 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: ice, mim & bootstrap
I replied to a similar question a few weeks ago, and to my mind, a
better order is to impute and regress within each bootstrap sample. At
least that's the preferred order for complex survey bootstrap... and I
doubt that educational data have structure simpler than students
nested in schools :))
On 12/9/08, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> It means what it says. This is asking (a) too much (b) the wrong thing.
> You should impute first, then -bootstrap-. All caveats one can think of,
> and more, no doubt apply.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Xu, Haiyong
>
> Could somebody let me know if I can use mim to combine the bootstrap
> results using the imputed data? When I was running the following codes,
>
> mim, noi: bootstrap: regress science ses female math
>
> It gives me an error message of "prefix bootstrap not allowed after
> mim".
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/