[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: is there a -regress- command equivalent to the pair matched ttest?
From
Richard Goldstein <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: is there a -regress- command equivalent to the pair matched ttest?
Date
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:10:13 -0500
While your question is not completely clear, try this; after reshaping
to wide form, form a new variable that is the difference between the
matched pairs on your variable of interest; if you then regress with
only the constant on the right you will have exactly the paired t-test
results (try it); you can then add other predictors to the regress command.
Rich
josemaria wrote:
Dear Statalisters:
I am not sure whether it makes sense or not, but is there a sort of
-regress- command that allows to conduct a pair-matched -ttest-, but
with other independent variables?
I tried using -xtmixed-, but the result is not the same.
A contrived data set could be:
matching_identification outcome ocasion variable_not_matched
1 1 1 0
1 2 2 0
2 3 1 0
2 5 2 1
3 2 1 0
3 4 2 1
4 6 1 1
4 5 2 1
To perform the pair-matched ttest it is necessary to -reshape- and to
use -ttest outcome1==outcome2-, losing the independent
variable_not_matched.
Thank for any orientation.
Regards,
José Maria
Jose Maria Pacheco de Souza, Professor Titular (aposentado)
Departamento de Epidemiologia/Faculdade de Saude Publica, USP
Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715
01246-904 - S. Paulo/SP - Brasil
fones (11)3061-7747; (11)3768-8612
fax (11)3714-2403
www.fsp.usp.br/~jmpsouza
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |