Hello all,
----- "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the occasion of this thread: Is capitalization in the names of
> returned results really advisable? - e(Xmfx_dydx)- may be used less frequently,
> but I remember being bitten by -r(var)- as opposed to -r(Var)- after -sum-.
> What is the benefit of a capitalized "V" here?
Thank you Martin. Your code -loc ap5 = r(p5)- after -sum a, detail- works fine.
Also, I really appreciate your careful looking at my code and finding about typos
In fact, I got an error from -r(var)- exactly like you just told me. Well, I made all the typos here because I did not copy my code exactly from my program. I try
to simplify and focus on my problem.
Also, thank you Marrten for your suggestion. I will try out your suggestion
next.
However, Martin, I have a few questions for you, please. Your answer would
help educate me about Stata programming.
1) For the 2 ways of coding, which one is faster in terms of simulating time.
Also, for the first way, -r(p5)- has a specific reference to the 5th percentile
from the -sum, detail- command, right? When I look at -r(r1)-, how and what
would this refer to?
1st way: sum a, detail
loc ap5 = r(p5)
2nd way: _pctile a, p(5)
loc ap5 = r(r1)
2) I have tried to run your suggested program (copy and paste it in the do and
run). I got an error saying
class system failure
class system failure
class system failure
class system failure
class system failure
class system failure
--more--
I did -set trace on- and see a lot of red characters in many places. Also the
-trace- output seems very long. I am not sure I should post it here.
What would be the problem here?
Thank you very much,
Anupit
PS I am using Stata SE 9 on Window Vista Home
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
