That you are correct.
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss
Sent: 28 November 2008 17:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: how to reply on Statalist [was: RE: st: Categorizing HIV
status using a series of string variables]
What is the implication of what you are saying?
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 6:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: how to reply on Statalist [was: RE: st: Categorizing HIV
status
using a series of string variables]
Wrong! On closer inspection I see there's threading that offers
something different from the StataCorp or Harvard archives.
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Cox
Sent: 28 November 2008 17:09
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: how to reply on Statalist [was: RE: st: Categorizing HIV
status using a series of string variables]
You're correct. That is still active. I am not expert either, which is
why I don't understand why people want a third archive. There are two
already.
Nick
[email protected]
Martin Weiss
"... to set up RSS feeds for Statalist, all of which seem to have
stalled
somehow."
I am not an expert for this stuff, but
http://groups.google.de/group/statalistrss
looks like an RSS feed to me...
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
