Thanks Neil.
Ashim.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Neil Shephard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ashim Kapoor wrote:
>> Hello Carlo,
>>
>> cond would not be useful cos it can do ONLY 2 conditions. I want to be
>> able to use it in MANY conditions. Is there a SUPER cond which can do
>> that ?
>>
> I'm not aware, nor am I clear on what you mean by a "SUPER cond", but
> its straight-forward and permissible to nest -cond()- statements along
> the lines of...
>
> gen t = cond(a == 1, 1, cond(b == 1, 2, cond(c == 1, 3, 0, .), .), .)
>
> Neil
>
> --
> "We should make things as simple as possible, but not simpler" - Anon (not Albert Einstein)
>
>
> ***********************************************************************
> This message may contain confidential and privileged information.
> If you are not the intended recipient you should not disclose, copy
> or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance
> on its contents. To do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> Please inform the sender that this message has gone astray before
> deleting it. Thank you.
>
> 2008 marks the 60th anniversary of the NHS. It's an opportunity to pay
> tribute to the NHS staff and volunteers who help shape the service, and
> celebrate their achievements.
>
> If you work for the NHS and would like an NHSmail email account, go
> to: www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
> ***********************************************************************
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
