Maarten,
Thanks, both versions worked as you suggested. Is there any reason
why a scalar is a bad choice here? I ask because of the wording you
used about "insisting" upon it vs. "easier" to use a macro, etc.
Tom
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Maarten buis <[email protected]>
wrote:
--- Thomas Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
summ Companies
scalar Count = r(max)
but I keep getting errors when I try to substitute Count into my
forvalues statement:
.
. forvalues i=1/Count{
2. local eqn "`eqn' (LnRtFiveYrMid`i'
L(1/2).LnRtFiveYrMid`i' L(0/4).LnRtCDX LnRtC
> MT LnRtTED L(0/2).LnRtStock`i') "
3. }
invalid syntax
If you insist on using a scalar in this context you can type:
forvalues i = 1/`=scalar(Count)' {
Easier is to store the count in a local:
summ Companies
local Count = r(max)
forvalues i=1/`Count'{
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room N515
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Thomas Jacobs
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/