|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtmixed output
This is covered in Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal's book available from
Stata Press.
Note -xtreg- gives a z statistic as does -xtmixed- and -gllamm-. It is
-regress- that give the t statistic.
According the authors, "The reason this statistic is called z instead
of t is that a standard normal sampling distribution is assumed under
the null hypothesis that B = 0 instead of a t distribution. The t
distribution is a finite sample distribution whose shape depends on
the degrees of freedom. For the variance components model, the finite
sample distribution does not have a simple form, so Stata's commands
used the asymptotic (large-sample) sampling distribution. (Some other
software packages approximate the finite-sample distribution by a t
distribution where the degrees of freedom are some function of the
data.) ..."
and they go one from there...
On Oct 27, 2008, at 5:00 AM, Gabriele Schino wrote:
Dear Statalisters,
I have a (possibly silly) question about the output provided by
xtmixed.
In testing the significance of the individual independent variables
xtmixed provides a z value and a P value. This is in contrast with,
for example, xtreg, that provides t, df and P values.
My question is: given that my sample is obviously finite, shouldn't
xtmixed test significance using a statistic (like t) for finite
samples? How do I attach a df to my test?
Thank you very much for your help.
All the best,
Gabriele Schino
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/