|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: outreg, outreg2, and the thread-jacking
>If the avenue to the solution involved the number 2 on
>-ssc hot- and not the clear number one, that is because
>a user of the number two (me, that is) bothered to reply.
>But hey, a little competition keeps everybody on their toes,
>right?
This explains many things. Martin apparently thinks there is
some kind of competition going on.
I sometimes wish Kit Baum did not publicize the SSC ranking.
While I understand the need for it, it attracts people who care
such things. This is one of the funny things about social interactions
that makes you constantly affected by things you don't care about
because of the people who do.
If I wanted to "compete" with a program, I would not have done
it the way I did. The logical thing would have been to hijack as many
threads about -outreg- as possible, establish a website for it, present
it at Stata conferences on the both sides of the Atlantic, put it into the
Stata Journal (twice), write complementary programs that increase
the demand for the first one, and duplicate other people's ideas and
efforts and present them as one's own, because, by golly, the need
to get on the top of the ranking is overwhelming.
I wrote -outreg2- as a public service and an experiment in
programming. I don't think John cared about the ranking,
either (since there wasn't one). Some people don't understand
this, and this makes me sad.
Roy
_________________________________________________________________
Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/