Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: undocumented command *


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Re: undocumented command *
Date   Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:41:42 +0200

Shameless advert: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0040

But your message indicates you already knew that.

Apart from that, I think of -zipfile- and -unzipfile-. They both do good services in one of my ados, but have to the best of my knowledge never been acknowledged... I think there was a post by Sergiy back in the day that alerted me to their presence :-)

HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eva Poen" <[email protected]>
To: "Statalist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:36 PM
Subject: st: undocumented command *



Today I stumbled upon this neat little command -*-, whose only purpose
in life seems to be to do nothing at all, and swallow everything
behind it:

* blah blubb this does not make any sense but Stata doesn't complain,
surprisingly

(Try typing this in Stata.) I found it while implementing some
entertaining dots for my exact unconditional test program, in the
style of -simulate- etc. I examined simulate.ado, and there it was.
-which *- shows that it officially doesn't exist.

I was wondering if there are more of these "hidden gems", which might
be useful in programming, but are not only undocumented but also
invisible for -which-. Any suggestions?

Eva
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index