[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Re: undocumented command *
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: undocumented command *
Date
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:41:42 +0200
Shameless advert: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0040
But your message indicates you already knew that.
Apart from that, I think of -zipfile- and -unzipfile-. They both do good
services in one of my ados, but have to the best of my knowledge never been
acknowledged... I think there was a post by Sergiy back in the day that
alerted me to their presence :-)
HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eva Poen" <[email protected]>
To: "Statalist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:36 PM
Subject: st: undocumented command *
Today I stumbled upon this neat little command -*-, whose only purpose
in life seems to be to do nothing at all, and swallow everything
behind it:
* blah blubb this does not make any sense but Stata doesn't complain,
surprisingly
(Try typing this in Stata.) I found it while implementing some
entertaining dots for my exact unconditional test program, in the
style of -simulate- etc. I examined simulate.ado, and there it was.
-which *- shows that it officially doesn't exist.
I was wondering if there are more of these "hidden gems", which might
be useful in programming, but are not only undocumented but also
invisible for -which-. Any suggestions?
Eva
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |