--- Nirina F <[email protected]> wrote:
> My dependent variable is a binary variable. Onn the following example
> y=b1x1+b2x2+b3x3+e,
> if I use reg to estimate b's , I should get more or less the same
> results as the marginal effects after probit.
> Now after reg, I can use predict e1, resid but after probit how can I
> get the same thing as e1?
There is no longer one type of residual after a model like -probit-,
but many different types, six of which are directly available after
-glm-, but only one after -probit-:
*--------------- begin example ----------------------
sysuse auto, clear
probit foreign price mpg
predict dev_probit, deviance
glm foreign price mpg, family(binomial) link(probit)
predict dev_glm, deviance
predict ans_glm, anscombe
predict lik_glm, likelihood
predict pea_glm, pearson
predict res_glm, response
predict wor_glm, working
*---------------- end example ------------------------
(For more on how to use examples I sent to the Statalist, see
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/stata/exampleFAQ.html )
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
