On 8/13/08, Richard Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 11:57 AM 8/13/2008, Nick Cox wrote:
> > I have mentioned it in another thread, but this deserves separate
> > flagging: Stata 10.1 is now available for download by those with Stata
> > 10. Use -update-.
> >
> > Among various new features I am particularly pleased to welcome -- at
> > long last -- a clutch of random-number functions!
> >
>
> Skimming through it, it looks like there is some good stuff. The main thing
> I dislike is that some functions are being renamed and the old names are now
> undocumented (and some old names are unsupported except under version
> control.) Old habits tend to be hard to break, plus it can drive me nuts
> looking at old code and trying to figure out what a now-undocumented
> function is doing.
Can help be subjected to version control too?
E.g.
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?regress
can show the current (last version) syntax of regress, while
http://www.stata.com/help7.cgi?regress
could show syntax of regress as in Version 7.
http://www.stata.com/help8.cgi?regress
could show syntax of regress as in Version 8.
....
etc.
Is that at all possible?
Sergiy
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
