Arne and Stas,
Thanks much for your very generous help with my problem. I think we now have at least two more options to derive some estimates thanks to your suggestions.
Regards,
Dan Petrolia
>>> "Arne Risa Hole" <[email protected]> 5/2/2008 5:28 AM >>>
I agree with Stas that -nlcom- is likely to be a good alternative to
the bootstrap but it's worth keeping in mind that it will not be very
accurate if the distribution of mean WTP is highly non-normal. This
could be the case since WTP is often derived as a function of the
ratio of coefficient estimates. In this case the parametric bootstrap
represents a compromise between accuracy (-bootstrap-) and computing
speed (-nlcom-).
Arne
On 01/05/2008, Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you
> can express WTP as the function of estimated parameters, then you
> should consider -nlcom- that would give you the delta method standard
> errors -- if you can technically do that, I would not bother with the
> bootstrap. You would probably find yourself wasting a week of your
> time setting your bootstrap up properly, to find the standard errors
> only differ in the third decimal point from those in -nlcom-.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
