Thanks Maarten, Peter, and Berthold. I arrived at a similar
conclusion--addressing the problem through logistic regression. But,
I'm interested in Maarten's and Berthold's use of -suest-, which, from
what I gather, is the Chow test (or something like it), right?
Maarten, your model tested the interaction term in the logit. Am I
right to assume that, in this situation, the Chow test and the logit
test of the interaction term are accomplishing similar goals?
Thanks,
-p
______________________________________
Paul F. Visintainer, PhD
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
School of Public Health
New York Medical College
PH: (914) 594-4804
FX: (914) 594-4853
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maarten buis
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: trend in ORs across ordered levels of a 3rd variable
--- Visintainer, Paul asked:
> What I wanted to know is whether we can detect a linear pattern of
> the ORs over levels of the confounder (which, to me, looks like a
> specific type of interaction)
--- Peter A. Lachenbruch answered:
> This sounds like a task for logistic regression using the confounder
> and the risk factor. If you want to see if there's effect
> modification, use the product of the risk factor and confounder. You
> may want to categorize these variables.
--- "Berthold Hoppe" responded:
> The problem seems to be similiar to one I am actually faced with.
> Have you tried an analyses like this:
>
> logit death consc if sex==0
> est store A
> logit death consc if sex==1
> est store B
> suest A B
> test [A]consc=[B]consc
There is no need to use -suest-, this is just an interaction term:
*----------- begin example -------------------
sysuse nlsw88, clear
gen byte grade3 = cond(grade < 12, 1, ///
cond(grade == 12, 2, 3)) ///
if grade < .
gen southXgrade3 = south*grade3
logit marr south grade3 southXgrade3
logit marr grade3 if south == 1
est store A
logit marr grade3 if south == 0
est store B
suest A B
test [A]grade3=[B]grade3
*---------------- end example ----------------
(For more on how to use examples I sent to the Statalist, see
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/stata/exampleFAQ.html )
However, the propper interpretation of these results is a very very
tricky issue regardless of whether you estimate this using an
interaction term or -suest- and you will want to take a good look at:
http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0063
There is also a second problem with this approach which is among others
discussed in this post:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-02/msg00892.html.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
