|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Oaxaca decomposition for beginners
Hello statalist members,
I'm new to statistics and Stata. I just follow the example in the help
file but unfortunately I'm not able to interpret the output. I wish to
test for wage discrimination amongst European and non-European footballers
using the Oaxaca method. Here is what I did:
. reg logwages caps apps asiprob golprob ycprob rcprob if eu==0
. est sto noneu
. reg logwages caps apps asiprob golprob ycprob rcprob if eu==1
. est sto yeseu
. oaxaca yeseu noneu
(high estimates: noneu; low estimates: yeseu)
Mean prediction 1 =
10.29027
Mean prediction 2 =
10.08027
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
difference | .2100054 .0809862 2.59 0.010 .0512754
.3687354
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linear decomposition
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
three-fold |
endowments | .0831522 .0588726 1.41 0.158 -.032236
.1985405
coefficients | .1430246 .0879633 1.63 0.104 -.0293803
.3154294
interaction | -.0161714 .0717465 -0.23 0.822 -.156792
.1244493
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. oaxaca noneu yeseu, weight(1 0.5 0 omega)
(high estimates: noneu; low estimates: yeseu)
Mean prediction 1 =
10.29027
Mean prediction 2 =
10.08027
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
difference | .2100054 .0809862 2.59 0.010 .0512754
.3687354
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linear decompositions
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
W=1 |
explained | .0669809 .0689001 0.97 0.331 -.0680609
.2020226
unexplained | .1430246 .0879633 1.63 0.104 -.0293803
.3154294
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
W=,5 |
explained | .0750665 .053101 1.41 0.157 -.0290095
.1791426
unexplained | .1349389 .0758584 1.78 0.075 -.0137409
.2836186
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
W=0 |
explained | .0831522 .0588726 1.41 0.158 -.032236
.1985405
unexplained | .1268532 .0796571 1.59 0.111 -.0292718
.2829781
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
W=omega |
explained | .0824304 .0512448 1.61 0.108 -.0180075
.1828683
unexplained | .127575 .067142 1.90 0.057 -.004021
.259171
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My questions are:
1) Am I doing the right thing? (i.e. decomposition)
2) How do I use the result to make an interpretation? How much of the
difference is explained vs. unexplained?
3) What is the command weight(1 0.5 0 omega) for?
I'm really new to all this and hope you guys don't feel annoyed if my
questions are too basic.
Thanks.
Khalis.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/