 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: z/t-value "."?
At 04:28 PM 4/17/2008, Maarten buis wrote:
--- Markus K�ller <[email protected]> wrote:
> The output sais: 0 failures, 13 successes completely determined.
That could be the cause of the missing standard errors.
-- Maarten
Markus may want to take a look at -exlogistic- if
he has Stata 10. As the help notes,
exlogistic is an alternative to logistic, the
standard maximum likelihood-based logistic
regression; see [R] logistic. exlogistic
produces more accurate inference in small samples
because it does not depend on asymptotic results
and exlogistic can better deal with one-way
causation, such as the case where all females are
observed to have a positive outcome.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/