Hi,
like nobody answered to my question, I wonder if I was really clear.
I want to estimate a system of nonlinear equations with nlsur and I have some variables which are endogeneous. I woul like to instrument them but I don't know how to succeed in it with "nlsur". I wonder if a two steps method is the only way to do and if so how to correc the standard errors resulting from my 2sls instrumentation.
Thank you very much.
val�rie
-------------------------------
Val�rie OROZCO
Toulouse School of Economics (INRA-GREMAQ)
21, all�e de Brienne
F-31000 Toulouse, France
MF 426
+33 5 61 12 85 91
________________________________________
De : Valerie Orozco
Date d'envoi : mercredi 9 avril 2008 15:54
� : [email protected]
Objet : st : endogeneous variables with nlsur and reg3
Hello,
I 'm estimating a system of equations with nlsur. I have some variables that are endogeneous and I would like to instrument them. I don't know if it is possible or not, thanks to nlsur or by hand...
If I can add one equation (the instrumentation one) to the nlsur command, it would be easy.
Another idea I had, was to estimate in two steps (first the instrumentation equation, then taking the predicted value and put it in the general equation...but I will probably have a problem with the standard errors.)
Like I know how to deal with endogeneity with reg3 (with linear equations), I made some comparisons between reg3 and nlsur...
/*****************************************************/
/*1st comparison : without any endogeneous variable*/
/*****************************************************/
nlsur (w1 = {c1} + {b01}*X1 + {b11} * lnp1 + {b21} * lnp2 )
reg3(w1 X1 lnp1 lnp2 )
--> nlsur and reg3 give same results
/*****************************************************/
/*2nd comparison : one variable is endogeneous (suppose it is lnp1)*/
/*****************************************************/
reg3(w1 X1 lnp1 lnp2),endog(lnp1) exog(Z1 Z2)
nlsur (w1 = {c1} + {b1}*X1 + {bp1} * lnp1 + {bp2} * lnp2 ) ///
(lnp1 = {c2} + {z1}*Z1 +{z2}*Z2 +{x1}*X1 + {l2}*lnp2 )
--> not the same coefficients, nor the standard errors
/*****************************************************/
/*3rd comparison : */
/*****************************************************/
reg3(w1 X1 lnp1 lnp2), endog(lnp1) exog(Z1 Z2)
quietly reg lnp1 Z1 Z2 X1 lnp2
predict lnp1hat, xb
reg3 (w1 X1 lnp1hat lnp2) or nlsur (w1 = {c1} + {b1}*X1 + {bp1} * lnp1hat + {bp2} * lnp2 )
--> same coefficients, problem with the standard errors
So, is someone able to help me to apply the best method to instrument endogeneous variables with nlsur?
If I use 2 steps, how can I recover the true standard errors?
Thank you very much.
Val�rie
-------------------------------
Val�rie OROZCO
Toulouse School of Economics (INRA-GREMAQ)
21, all�e de Brienne
F-31000 Toulouse, France
MF 426
+33 5 61 12 85 91
-------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
