[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: initial values for -xtmelogit-?
Jeph Herrin wrote:
(As an aside, I could use -xtlogit, re-, which is considerably faster,
if only -predict- could be persuaded to predict random effects,
something which apparently is just a minor
fix: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-03/msg00135.html I had
hoped that Stata 10 would fix this, but apparently -xtlogit- is on the
path to deprecation.)
I second the desire for xtlogit to do EB prediction of the random
intercepts!
Jay
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/