In general, -estout- should not add such a blank line:
. sysuse auto
. reg price weight foreign
. tempfile foo
. estout using "`foo'", keep(weight) mlabels(none) collabels(none)
. estout using "`foo'", keep(weight) mlabels(none) collabels(none) append
. estout using "`foo'", keep(weight) mlabels(none) collabels(none) append
. type "`foo'"
weight 3.320737
weight 3.320737
weight 3.320737
Show me your exact command and maybe I can help.
ben
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Vladimir Vakhitov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you, Ben,
>
> I used collabels(none), but not mlabels(none). The problem is almost
> solved: the model headers disappeared. However, there is still an
> empty line between different regression results. I can't figure it out
> which default value is responsible for it. Do you happen to know if
> this is a feature of -estout-, or it is possible to remove it as well?
>
> Vladimir.
>
> 2008/3/23, Ben Jann <[email protected]>:
>
>
> > The -estout- header has different elements, depending on context.
> >
> > . estout, mlabels(none) collabels(none)
> >
> > will probably do the job in your case.
> >
> > ben
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Vakhitov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Dear Statalisters,
> > >
> > > I have to run about a dozen regressions with the same variables, but
> > > on different samples. My major interest is only one coefficient (let's
> > > call it be b_ZZ) in all these regressions, and I want to stack values
> > > of these coefficients into one meta-table, something like this:
> > > Sample b_ZZ
> > > 1 .23***
> > > 2 .93*
> > > 3 .32**
> > > 4 .002
> > >
> > > In principle, I could use e(b) and e(V) results to do that, but I need
> > > the result with "significance stars", and in this case I will have to
> > > program this manually, which I am not very strong at yet.
> > >
> > > I tried to use -estout- with -keep(ZZ)- option. It works almost OK,
> > > but I still have to copy the result into an Excel file to remove the
> > > headers of each regression. Once the number of samples increases this
> > > task becomes quite cumbersome. I tried to remove the headers from
> > > within -estout- command, but I coudn't find an option like, for
> > > example, [nomodelhead]. Is that still possible to exclude model
> > > headers from -estout output?
> > >
> > > Any other ideas how to preserve only coefficients for required -est-
> > > results with significance stars?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > --
> > > __________________
> > > Volodymyr Vakhitov
> > > [email protected]
> > > *
> > > * For searches and help try:
> > > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> > >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> __________________
> Volodymyr Vakhitov
> [email protected]
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
