|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Intercept estimates in -nlogit- with case-specific variables
I'm trying to run a nested logit model on data with all case-specific
predictors, and I am confused about the presence/role of the
intercept. What confuses me is that none of the examples in the
manual entry on -nlogit- show any estimate of the intercept, although
I have seen this elsewhere.
My understanding that with case-specfic predictors, the intercept
estimate is meaningful, and can be obtained with a proper data setup,
by which I mean that for each case, there are records in the file
for each alternative, with indicator variables to mark each possible
alternative, and indicator X covariate product variables for each
case-specific covariate. This kind of setup, if used
with -clogit- with case-specific predictors, produces intercept (and
other) estimates identical to -mlogit-.
So, is it appropriate to use these indicator terms to to pick up the
intercept estimates in an -nlogit- that has only case--specific variables?
Regards,
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mike Lacy, Assoc. Prof.
Soc. Dept., Colo. State. Univ.
Fort Collins CO 80523 USA
(970)-491-6721
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/