Re: st: clogit data format

[Margaret R Grove <margaret.r.grove@Dartmouth.EDU>]

Thanks very much - that is a very helpful reference!

Margaret

Verkuilen, Jay wrote:
> Nick Cox wrote:
>
>   
> > > If I understand this correctly, individuals for whom all raters agree
> > >       
> cannot 
> be included in a -clogit- analysis. That seems to rule it out absolutely
> as a way of examining the structure of agreement and disagreement.
> [snip]<<
>
> Indeed, such agreement models are often done in a latent class framework
> (which for Stata would imply use of gllamm or some other user-created
> download). Might I suggest taking a look at:
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/agree.htm.
>
> Jay 
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>   
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/