Danny--
This is your second question from yesterday, to which I answered
(yesterday) that you should compare the cluster-robust statistic
(5.26) to the crit value and therefore conclude you have a problem.
You will find discussion of constructing Anderson Rubin confidence
regions in http://www.stata.com/meeting/5nasug/wiv.pdf (and its refs).
If you strongly believe your model is correct:
ivreg2 y1 x1 x2 (y2=z1), ffirst cluster (x3)
you can also add excluded instruments like so:
g x1z1=x1*z1
g x2z1=x2*z1
g z2=z1^2
ivreg2 y1 x1 x2 (y2=z1 x1z1 x2z1 z2), ffirst cue cl(x3)
and now you have overID tests available to you as well.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Danny Cohen-Zada <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Professor Shaffer,
>
> I thought again and i think i understood that i should compare 5.26 to 16.38
> and i should be worry about the strength of my instrument. Am i right?
>
> Danny
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
