|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: complex difference-in-difference approach with e.g. economic sectors
From |
Pascal Sulser <[email protected]> |
To |
[email protected] |
Subject |
st: complex difference-in-difference approach with e.g. economic sectors |
Date |
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:29:49 +0100 |
Hi,
Does anyone know the correct specification for a difference-in-
difference (DID) approach with e.g. economic sectors included. In a
standard regression (no DID) I use e.g.
"reg unemployment_rate age age2 sector1 sector2" --> assuming the
base group is working in the tertiary sector
Now, if I want to do a difference-in-difference approach to see
weather there exists a significant difference between male workers and
female worker, which of the two variants is the correct to chose,
assuming there are differences between all independent variables?
1. reg unemployment_rate female age age_female age2 age2_female
sector1 sector1_female sector2 sector2_female
OR
2. reg unemployment_rate female age age_female age2 age2_female
sector1 sector1_female sector2 sector2_female sector3_female
I am not quite sure whether regression 1. is the right one assuming
that if female==1 then this means she is a women working in the
tertiary sector or whether I have to add that interaction term, too.
Thank you very much for your help, already!
Pascal
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/