|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: using "/" symbol in matrix row names, Stata 10
From |
[email protected] (Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP) |
To |
[email protected] |
Subject |
Re: st: using "/" symbol in matrix row names, Stata 10 |
Date |
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:10:03 -0600 |
Zurab Sajaia <[email protected]> asks about using "/" in matrix stripes:
> This question might refer to the StataCorp folks but I still decided to post
> it here. And apologies for asking it again but the last time it was part of
> another discussion and I guess escaped most of the people's attention.
>
> In the previous versions it was legitimate to write:
>
> . mat a=4
> . mat rownames a = /name
>
> and the result was as expected (by me):
>
> . mat list a
> symmetric a[1,1]
> c1
> /name 4
>
> . mat rownames a = eqn:/name
>
> . mat list a
> symmetric a[1,1]
> c1
> eqn:/name 4
>
> Now if I try to do the same thing in Stata 10:
>
> . mat a=4
> . mat rownames a = /name
> . mat list a
> symmetric a[1,1]
> c1
> name:_cons 4
>
> and in the second case:
>
> . mat rownames a = eqn:/name
> /name invalid name
>
> Since I'm using "/" symbol in the matrix row names in one of my programs I'd
> really like to know if it's a bug in Stata 10 that might be fixed some time
> soon or the change in behavior was intentional (I couldn't find any changes
> in the help file) and I need to modify my program in order for it to keep
> working.
This change was intentional.
As Zurab has shown above, -matrix rownames- and -matrix colnames- in Stata 10
interpret "/name" to mean "name:_cons" so "eq:/name" is now an invalid
syntax. This change was made to make matrix stripe logic consistent with how
-_b- and -_se- are interpreted. Here is an example of what I mean.
. sysuse auto
(output omitted)
. intreg mpg mpg
(output omitted)
. di _b[/lnsigma]
1.3469236
The above works in Stata 10 and earlier.
Now, in Stata 10 you can also do
. matrix b = 55, 1.5
. matrix colname b = /xb /lnsigma
. matrix list b
b[1,2]
xb: lnsigma:
_cons _cons
r1 55 1.5
-ml- has advertised this short-cut notation since Stata 6, so we didn't
foresee that this would cause anyone trouble. We regret the trouble we have
caused Zurab.
--Jeff
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/