Can you show me a copy of your commands and output?
ben
On 10/1/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Ben for your help.
> I try to use oaxaca but in the output I don't see the selection effect, I use
> oaxaca male female, adjust(lambda).
> Thanks again.
> Best,
>
>
>
> Quoting Ben Jann <[email protected]>:
>
> > The effect of selection is the remainder, i.e. the difference between
> > the raw differential and the selection adjusted differential. It is
> > reported at the end of -decompose-'s output ("... differential due to
> > selection variable ...").
> >
> > Also have a look at the -oaxaca- command, available from the SSC
> > Archive (type -ssc install oaxaca-), which is a successor of
> > -decompose-.
> >
> > ben
> >
> > On 9/30/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Dear Statalist,
> >> I try to do an estimation with oaxaca and heckman and I want to
> >> separate the effects of selection, endowment and remuneration.
> >> I use the command decompose, lambda(lbda) but this command return me
> >> only two effects: endowment and remuration.
> >> How I can separate the other effect (selection)?
> >> I will appreciate any help to solve this problem.
> >> Thanks in advance
> >> Best,
> >> Catia.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *
> >> * For searches and help try:
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
