|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: panel with cross-sectional dependence nd endogeneity
Quoting [email protected]:
hi Nicola,
it seems that your answer is usefull for me, too. namely, I asked about
how to estimate random effects with robust errors. the question still
stays: which Stata version are you using? I can not find command xtscc
in my 9.2 version. and what about dashes? could you, please, clarify?
thank you so much.
Jasminka
-xtscc- (remember the dashes!) is useful for both cross-sectional
dependence and heteroskedasticity, while fixed effects (it's one of
the two options) allows for endogeneity
Nicola
At 02.33 21/09/2007 -0400, "Ivan Etzo" wrote:
Dear All,
my panel (N=3D2660 ; T=3D7) presents either heteroskedasticity =
(lrtest and xttest3) endogeneity and cross-sectional dependence
(xtc= sd test). Moreover there is also serial correlation (xtserial
test).
Thank to statalist I found useful commands to correct my analysis
bu= t I haven't found a way to cope with all of them together yet.&=
nbsp;The command xtscc for ex. is useful for the cross-sectional
dependen= ce (nd maybe also heteroskedasticity..?) but not in the
case of endogenou= s covariates. For the endogeneity problem, I
tried different commands lik= e ivreg2 and xthtaylor, the last one
give nice results in terms of expect= ed coeff signs and their
significance, but they don't provide correct SE = for cross-sect
dependence. Xtgls seems good for heteroskedasticity (= and serial
correlation) but not for endogeneity.
I can say that I'm new with empirical analysis and panel data so
eve= ry suggestion or comment would be pretty appreciated.
thanks to all
Ivan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/