[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Re: memory size 7 data merging
From
"Michael Blasnik" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Re: memory size 7 data merging
Date
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:10:20 -0400
tabulate the _merge variable after using the nokeep option and you can just look
at the resulting number of observations to calculate how many _merge==2
observations there would have been (at least if you aren't doing a many-to-many
merge, which you shouldn't be). Obviously the nokeep option will be of little
help if there would be few _merge==2 observations.
Michael Blasnik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Coveney" <[email protected]>
To: "Statalist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: st: Re: memory size 7 data merging
<snip>>
With -nokeep-, would you need to sacrifice any -assert _merge == 3-
and -assert inlist(_merge, 1, 3)-? I would dread not being able to take
advantage of -assert- after a -merge- with the datasets that I get handed.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |