Hi, Anil:
I got the same concern but I have found an answer in the STATA official
website. See:
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/wbl.html
Regards,Zhong
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anil Caliskan
Sent: 14 September 2007 12:33
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Positive log likelihood values in a switching regression
Dear Stata list:
I am trying to determine a regime switch date using the framework suggested
in Goldfeld and Quandt (1973) and applied in Mankiw (1987). The regressions
are modeled as below:
yt = beta01 + beta11*x1t + beta21*t + beta31*t^2 + e1t for t=1,...,i-1
yt = beta02 + beta12*x1t + beta22*t + beta32*t^2 + e2t for t=i,...,N
I ran the regressions for all possible regime switch dates, i's, and
calculated the log likelihood based on the formula:
logL=-0.5*N*log(2*pi)-(i-1)*log(sigma1^2)-(N-(i-1))*log(sigma2^2)-0.5*(e1'e1
/sigma1^2)-0.5*(e2'e2/sigma2^2)
I obtained e.'e. by using e(rss) and sigma. by using e(rmse) after each
regression.
The likelihood function that I computed is concave, however values are
positive, which is the cause of my concern. I would be grateful if you help
me understand why I am getting positive instead of negative values and if I
am making a mistake.
Thanks in advance.
Anil Caliskan.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
