Dear All,
Please, find here the two complete refernces for the two papers that I
quoted in my previous email:
Stock, J.H. and Wright, J.H. 2000. GMM with Weak Identification.
Econometrica, Vol. 68, No. 5, September, pp. 1055-1096.
Stock, J.H. and Yogo, M. 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in
Linear IV Regression. In D.W.K. Andrews and J.H. Stock, eds.
Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in
Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2005, pp. 80–108. Working paper version: NBER Technical
Working Paper 284. http://www.nber.org/papers/T0284.
Regards,
Erasmo
On 7/30/07, Erasmo Giambona <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am estimating a model with 6 endogenous variables and 19 excluded
> instruments. I understand Stock-Yogo weak ID critical values are not
> available in this case. Can I use the F-test for exluded instruments
> and/or the Shea's partial R2 as alternative tests in this case?
>
> My second question is on how to interpret the Stock-Wright (2000)
> test. The Stata help says: "The null hypothesis tested in both cases
> is that the coefficients of the endogenous regressors in the
> structural equation are jointly equal to zero, and, in addition, that
> the overidentifying restrictions are valid. Both tests are robust to
> the presence of weak instruments." I find a bit hard to understanding
> this definition. For my case I get
> Chi-sq(19)=36.62 P-val=0.0088. Does this mean that my endogenous
> regressors in the structural equation are jointly different from zero,
> but my instruments are not valid?
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Erasmo
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
