That's the impression I have, Al.
I'll also note that syntax 3 assumes partial SS's,
even if you specified sequential SS's in the ANOVA.
Tom
-----------------------------------
Thomas J. Steichen
[email protected]
-----------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: anova mtest with alternate error term
Hi - In Stata 9, I wanted to test some multiple contrasts after anova
using the matrix method (syntax 1) - but there doesn't appear to be a
way to specify an error term for these multiple tests other than the
default "residual". Apparently, only syntax 3 (specified effects) allows
this. Am I missing something, or do I have to do this calculation by
"hand"?
Al Feiveson
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
-----------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail message, including any
attachment(s), contains information that may be confidential,
protected by the attorney-client or other legal privileges, and/or
proprietary non-public information. If you are not an intended
recipient of this message or an authorized assistant to an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution,
or reproduction of this message and/or any of its attachments (if
any) by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
