| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Re: new sampling problem
...
I don't really understand what you are doing here, but the most obvious error
is -local news=newvar1-. Where is newvar1 defined? If newvar1 is a variable,
then the local macro will only contain the first observation of that variable
because you can't assign a variable to a macro like that. Your code is too
convoluted for me to figure out how to fix it. I'm also fairly certain that you
don't want to use mkmat, restore, svmat in sequence.
Michael Blasnik
----- Original Message -----
From: "John allfish" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: st: Re: new sampling problem
Thanks for this, and for the setting the seed advice.
I have tried to sort this out with this very crude program but it only seems
to do the sampling for one value of newvar1, can anyone help me with this? the
first part of the do file defines the data. The last part does the sampling I
am interested in. It is very, very crude - and it may seem a little odd,
although I know what I want to do.
clear
range y 1 10 10
sum y
gen income=.
replace income=1 in 1/4
replace income=2 in 5/8
replace income=3 in 9/10
gen sex1=.
replace sex1=2 in 1/5
replace sex1=1 in 6/10
gen sex2=.
replace sex2=1 in 1/3
replace sex2=2 in 4/5
replace sex2=3 in 6/10
tab income
tab sex1
tab sex2
preserve
sort sex2
contract sex2
tempvar newvar
samplepps newvar, size(_freq) withrepl ncases(100)
mkmat newvar
restore
svmat newvar
gen const=1
local news=newvar1
foreach val of local news{
samplepps sample`val', ncases(`val') withrepl size(const)
}
<snip>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/