Why would another list make a (positive) difference? Indeed, it would
create inefficiencies, and people would be tempted to cross-post in case
someone not on the gllamm list might have the answer (even if that
probability is modest), even though a substantial number of people on any
gllamm list would probably also be on statalist.
A separate list? Necessitating separate archives? So more searching for
old answers in multiple places? Not a good idea, IMHO.
Sam
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, E. Michael Foster wrote:
> I've noticed that there aren't many questions about -gllamm- questions
> on the list.
>
> Would folks be interested in a separate list for -gllamm- or have there
> been more questions about -gllamm-- than I realize?
>
> thanks--
>
> --
> E. Michael Foster
>
> getmike.info
>
> download vcard: www.unc.edu/~emfoster/Foster.vcf
>
> Professor of Maternal and Child Health
> of Health Policy and Administration
> of Biostatistics (adjunct)
>
> Associate Chair for Faculty Advancement
>
> (W) 919-966-3773
> (F) 919-966-0458
>
> Office: 407C Rosenau Hall << use for FEDEX
> School of Public Health
> University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
> Rosenau Hall, Campus Box# 7445
> Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7445
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
