| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: micombine and overall model fit statistics
At 08:11 PM 5/21/2007, Claire M. Kamp Dush wrote:
Dear statalist community,
I am using micombine to deal with my missing data. I only have one
issue - how do I get an overall model fit statistic with
micombine? Is this possible? For instance, I am using:
We had this discussion a couple of weeks ago. I basically asked the
same question in this thread
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00871.html
which somehow transmuted into this thread:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00874.html
See especially Maarten's very detailed post at
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00900.html
(although I think he said afterwards he had made a mistake somewhere).
I also like Rodrigo's suggestions very much. You could kill yourself
trying to get these computed exactly right, and still get it
wrong. But, if you look at the estimates produced by each separate
imputation and they are all about the same, then I don't think any
harm is done by following Rodrigo's suggestions. If, on the other
hand, you get big differences, then you may want to spend more time
trying to get it exactly right.
Incidentally, -mim- (available from SSC) is the successor to
-micombine-. It adds some useful new features. You may need to
rename your i and j variables to get it to work with your data set.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/