Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: routine to perform Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation in IV context


From   Kit Baum <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: routine to perform Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation in IV context
Date   Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:06:34 -0400

autocorrelation after IV/OLS estimation

DESCRIPTION/AUTHOR(S)

      ivactest performs the general specification test of serial
      correlation proposed by Cumby and Huizinga (1992) after OLS or
      instrumental variables (IV) estimation. In their words, the null
      hypothesis of the test is that the regression error is a  moving
      average of known order q>=0 against the general alternative that
      autocorrelations of the regression error are nonzero at lags
      greater than q. The test is general enough to test the hypothesis
      that the regression error has no serial correlation (q=0) or the
      null hypothesis that serial correlation in  the regression error
      exists, but dies out at a known finite lag (q>0). The test is
      especially attractive because it can be used in frequently
      encountered cases where alternative such as the Box-Pierce test
      (wntestq), Durbin's h test (estat durbinalt) and the
      Breusch-Godfrey test (estat bgodfrey) are not applicable.

      Requires: Stata version 9.2

Available now from SSC.

Kit Baum and Mark E. Schaffer

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index