Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Binary & continuous endogenous vars


From   Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: Binary & continuous endogenous vars
Date   Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:43:41 -0500

At 06:03 PM 4/28/2007, Schaffer, Mark E wrote:

> But is it legit to use ivreg for X4, e.g. do something like
>
> ivreg x4 x2 (x3 = x1 x2)

Google and ye shall find:

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-07/msg00710.html

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00337.html

http://www.statacorp.com/statalist/archive/2005-07/msg00322.html

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00339.html

http://www.datasets.org/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00415.html

Short answer: "yes".
Impressive list!!! Thanks. Slightly longer answer seems to be that there may be advantages to sometimes using cdsimeq or treatreg too?


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index