| ![](/includes/contimages/spacer.gif) |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: RE: Binary & continuous endogenous vars
At 06:03 PM 4/28/2007, Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
> But is it legit to use ivreg for X4, e.g. do something like
>
> ivreg x4 x2 (x3 = x1 x2)
Google and ye shall find:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-07/msg00710.html
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00337.html
http://www.statacorp.com/statalist/archive/2005-07/msg00322.html
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00339.html
http://www.datasets.org/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00415.html
Short answer: "yes".
Impressive list!!! Thanks. Slightly longer answer seems to be that
there may be advantages to sometimes using cdsimeq or treatreg too?
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/