[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: Why no probit with fixed effect?
Ncdcta00,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:10 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: Why no probit with fixed effect?
>
> Dear statalist, why don't use probit with fixed effect, but
> only random?
Because just including dummies does not give you a consistent estimator.
Have a look at
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2003-09/msg00103.html
Cheers,
Mark
> thanks
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
