|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: RE: heteroskedasticity questions
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: heteroskedasticity questions
Date
Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:19:09 -0500
At 11:02 AM 2/24/2007, Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
That appears to be the case. The -nr2- option doesn't seem to be
necessary when run after -regress-. Thanks for this and all the other
information!This last one is White's general test for heteroskedasticity, when used
with the -nr2- option. And if I'm not mistaken, it is also the
heteroskedasticity test stat reported by -estat imtest-.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |