Thanks Martin for both suggestions!
Your first point solved the problem... I knew that it was going to be
a simple mistake, but I just couldn't see it and I was pulling the few
hairs that I have left...
many thanks,
robert
On 2/9/07, Maarten buis <[email protected]> wrote:
--- Robert Duval <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a ml program that fails to pass the ml check. Aparently the
> problem occurs when ml fails to recognize one of the args (athrho)
> passed to the ln function. However, I have another almost identical
> program that runs perfectly!?!
I have two comments:
1. in your -ml- statement you have not specified /ux1 and /ux2
2. It is safer to replace the line:
scalar `rho'=(exp(2*`athrho')-1)/(exp(2*`athrho')+1)
with:
scalar `rho'=tanh(`athrho')
Less typing so less chance of a typo.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - with free PC-PC calling and photo sharing. http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
