[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re:st: Re: fixed effects vs random effects

From	"sistoand80" <[email protected]>
To	"statalist" <[email protected]>
Subject	Re:st: Re: fixed effects vs random effects
Date	Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:13:59 +0100

Hi everybody.
Kit Baum suggests an instrumental variable estimator to dela with endogeneity. But in this case what is the better estimator between IVfixed effect (xtivreg2, fe) and IV first-difference (xtivreg2, fd with, optionally, gmm)?
I've the same problem and I'm dealing with a small sample (14 countries, 6 years)
Thank you!
Andrea Sisto,
University of Turin (Italy)

---------- Initial Header -----------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re:st: Re: fixed effects vs random effects
  - From: "Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: st: RE: adding to X to make ln(X) nonmissing [was BTSCS and Non-linear MLE programming]
Next by Date: [no subject]
Previous by thread: st: Re: fixed effects vs random effects
Next by thread: Re: Re:st: Re: fixed effects vs random effects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread