|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: gologit2
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: gologit2
Date
Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:31:33 -0500
At 03:28 AM 1/30/2007, Maarten buis wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out Maarten. My experience has been that
models that produce negative predicted probabilities often have other
problems, e.g. the models are way too complicated given the amount of
data available. The FAQ has suggestions for dealing with this, but
if worse comes to worst you may want to switch to a non-ordinal
method such as mlogit.--- Juan Jose Miranda <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, I started to use generalized "gologit2", but results show me
> that 4% of observations have negative probability.
> So I would like to know how to reduce observation with negative
> probability or another method to estimate.
Richard Williams (author of gologit2) has written a FAQ on gologit2,
and negative predicted probabilities are discussed there:
http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/gologit2/tsfaq.html
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |