Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Panel re vs. fe model


From   "Thomas Erdmann" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Panel re vs. fe model
Date   Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:21:15 +0100

Hi - 

The drawbacks of Hausman test regarding its asymptotic assumptions or in a
cluster setting are discussed at several points in the Statalist.

e.g. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2005-08/msg00741.html
or several others by e.g. searching for "fe re cluster Hausman" in the
archives.

My conclusion would be that using -suest- would be a good alternative but is
not possible because -xtreg, fe- does not produce scores. I found another
alternative described here,
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2005-08/msg00853.html
where Vince Wiggins suggests using an artificial regression (find below).

Two questions: 

(1) Regarding the code below, could you just add the -cluster()- option as
further option and would the artificial regression still make sense?
(2) Are there yet other alternatives to the Hausman test in this setting?

Thanks for your feedback,
Tom


---------------------------------- BEGIN --- artreg.do --- CUT HERE -------
local id idcode
local depvar ln_wage
local varlist ttl_exp union white

iis `id'
xtreg `depvar' `varlist' , re

local i 0
foreach var of varlist `varlist' {
	egen mymean`++i' = mean(`var') if e(sample), by(`id')
}

xtreg `depvar' `varlist' mymean1-mymean`i' , re

testparm mymean1-mymean`i'
---------------------------------- END   --- artreg.do --- CUT HERE -------

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index