Hi,
Thanks for all your replies.
I my idea was to show this as a preliminary result.
So I would look at the class (exec and non execs) first and do a 2 sample
unequal variance t test, then for the gender alone I would do the same.
But of course each class would have both gender types and vice versa. Hence
the thought of a multiple means comparision test.
The main analysis would be based on a multivariate regression with the
variable caar as the dependent variable and dummies and their interaction
for the class of director and gender plus other control variables.
I will have a look at ologit, my impression was that ologit uses ordinal
dependent variable.
Thanks
rajesh
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron�n Conroy
Sent: 10 January 2007 09:45
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: RE: -oneway- and unequal variances - thanks
On 9 Ean 2007, at 19:14, Rajesh Tharyan wrote:
> My problem was this.
>
> I have a variable class which represents 4 classes of people who
> buy shares.
> They are male exec directors, female execdirectors, male non
> execdirectors,
> female non execdirectors. The corresponding var is class.
Aha! No, your problem isn't this.
You have TWO variables: gender and directorship.
Consider using -ologit- with the two binary variables and testing for
an interaction.
=========
Ron�n Conroy
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
[email protected]
+353 (0) 1 402 2431
+353 (0) 87 799 97 95
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ronanconroy
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/