Re: st: marginal effects after random effects ordered probit

[Scott Cunningham <scunning@gmail.com>]

On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:53 PM, schelkem@bluewin.ch wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Has anyone coded the mfx function to work after the random effects
> ordered probit estimator (reoprob)? Guillaume Frechette, the author
> of reoprob, said that he had many inquiries for the mfx
> postestimation function, and somebody might already have coded it.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Mark
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

I'm assuming that the straightforward syntax of -mfx- doesn't work  
then with -reoprob-?  With nonlinear models, I usually do something  
like:

- mfx, dydx-
- mfx, eyex-

with the first giving me the coefficients in terms of level on level  
and the latter in terms of an elasticity.  Your question makes me  
think -reoprob- may be different, but that's how you'd do it with,  
say, poisson or nbreg.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/