Andr�:
H0 is independence, i.e. no relation between rows and columns.
In your case you reject the hypothesis that the rows and columns are independent.
HTH,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting adress:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Andr� Paul
I was wondering what the null hypothesis is for Pearson's test after a two
way tabulation.
Is it that there is no relationship between column and rows or that there is
one?
For example, how is this result to be interpreted?
Pearson chi2(6) =184.1900 Pr = 0.000
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
