| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: Random effects models with different observations per group (household)
From |
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]> |
To |
<[email protected]> |
Subject |
st: RE: Random effects models with different observations per group (household) |
Date |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:14:43 +0100 |
Menale,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> menale kassie
> Sent: 13 September 2006 16:02
> To: SATAT
> Subject: st: Random effects models with different
> observations per group (household)
>
> Dear statalisters,
>
> I have repeated cross-sectional plot (farm field)
> observations per household. Some households have only one
> plot (i.e. one plot per household) and some households have
> more than one plot. Is it feasible to apply random effects
> when some households have only one plot and others have more
> than one plot?
I don't see why it isn't feasible. The random effects estimator is a
matrix-weighted combination of the between and within estimators. If a
household has only one plot, it's a singleton and hence contributes to
the between estimator but not the within estimator. In practice, it's
obtained via feasible GLS: do OLS on quasi-demeaned data, where
quasi-demeaned means subtracting some fraction <1 of the group mean from
the observation. In the case of a singleton, the "group mean" is just
the observation itself ... but I don't see what problems could arise
from this.
Cheers,
Mark
Prof. Mark Schaffer
Director, CERT
Department of Economics
School of Management & Languages
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS
tel +44-131-451-3494 / fax +44-131-451-3296
email: [email protected]
web: http://www.sml.hw.ac.uk/ecomes
> Any idea is appreciated. The model structure
> can look like the following
>
> Yhp = xhp + uh + ehp
> where h and p is indexing household and plot respectively
>
> Kind Regards,
> Menale
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around http://mail.yahoo.com
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/